
From a fan's perspective, I just didn't think that a single play-in game was worth it. It mad
e it worse when the two teams playing in for that open 16 seed were two teams that might never have been in the tournament before, or was one of the teams that made the tournament before, but came from one of the dreaded conferences doomed to "WHO THE HELL ARE YOU?" status. We'd commonly see teams from the mid-major, more commonly low-major, ranks, like your teams from the MEAC, SWAC, Mid-Con/Summit, NEC, and those smaller conferences that might make a scare in their conference tourney, but never in the NCAAs.
Now we add in three more teams, and according to Joe Lunardi, ESPN's resident bracketologist, he's projecting that the four play-in games will include two playing for a 16 seed, and two playing for maybe a 10 or 11 seed, depending on how the committee wants to break that down. I've always believed that the play-in game should be for the bubble teams to prove they really belong in the Thursday/Saturday or Friday/Sunda
y bracket set. Yes, this would mean tampering with not-so basketball BCS conferences. Dear God, I should ever want to see a bad Alabama team make it in over an Iona, Valparaiso, San Francisco, and the many mid-major schools that can only get into the NCAA tourney by winning their co
nference tournament. Am I right, folks?
I'll keep updating as we get closer, maybe have some solid picks of some of the smaller conferences, as I dislike all the talk of
the money conferences. In the meantime, go check out a local college game in the coming weeks. I don't care whatNCAA/NAIA/NJCAA level or division, men or women, just go check out a game. Maybe it's a way to have something to do on a
cold night in your town. Most schools make it really inexpensive family fun, and even if the basketball is bad, it's family time. What family doesn't need some family time this time of year?
No comments:
Post a Comment